After the acquittal of Ramush our dear friend, and that 'was spotted in the restaurants of Pristina to celebrate with his avvocatozzi, even on this blog and you' rightly rekindled the controversy entitled "The Hague Tribunal: this partisan."
What the Hague Tribunal receives pressioni che non dovrebbe ricevere credo sia un fatto abbastanza pacifico. Che sia stato voluto ed che sia supportato dagli americani, credo non sia un mistero. PIccola prova: l’idea di fare un’indagine seria sui bombardamenti della NATO del ‘99 gli e’ stata fatta rapidamente passata di mente. Male.
In Serbia la percezione del tribunale e’ a dir poco pessima. L’assoluzione dell’occhialuto Ramush e’ vista come l’ennesima riprova che il tribunale e’ strafazioso, e che condanna solo serbi.
Lo scorso weekend ho deciso di vederci chiaro e di scoprire se e’ vero.
Ci ho messo un bel paio di orette domenica, ma anche grazie al corso di Excel che ho fatto of rencente, I managed to put together a nice strip of 150 jailbirds, divided by nationality 'and charges, which were solicited by the Court since 1993
The plank itself' and if 'I'll save (if interested, please send by email). I propose a rather tasty pie chart:
100 out of 150 are Serbs, a good two thirds dry. We also see how many of these have so far been convicted:
37 to 56 are Serbs, again 2 / 3 correct. [Side note in 15 years (1993-2008) "our" and the court 'could inchiappettare only 56 people? If I wanted to do the populist I would also say: with more 'than a billion dollars spent ... on balance and every pay 'cost $ 20 million! ]
Back to war criminals or suspected. Forget those who died in the course of the proceedings (including, to name two, Arkan and Milosevic), have committed suicide (in or outside the cell), or are being made buckets while arresting them, and see the accused who are still under trial or awaiting trial:
Hey, What a coincidence, again the usual proportion: two-thirds (or four sixths, or 66%, if you prefer). 22 out of 33 defendants: the Serbs.
Ah, I forgot to say that Serbs are also all four of the last fugitives (Karadzic, Mladic and two others).
Charter sings. The court has investigated, prosecuted and convicted more 'Serb defendants who are charged with all the other nationalities' combined.
Sti biased judges have it right with the Serbs. But it 's really the only conclusion that you can' take?
I propose at least one other, just to keep in mind when training.
Note first that the "80% of Serbs investigated and prosecuted by the court are not Serbs in Serbia, but Serbs in Bosnia. Cosi 'like most of the Croats are Bosnian Croats.
Without denying that all have suffered greatly during the war, I think we can say that Bosnia and 'obscenity was the scene of' more 'crazy. I guess you could also say that the Serbian and Bosnian Serb army (Mladic, for instance) were by far the better armed (the JNA, the Yugoslav Army, was a very strong army). An army strong enough to hold siege to Sarajevo four years, a number of other besieged Muslim enclaves, hold in check the United Nations, the actions that others could only dream of.
If they had the weapons would have done the other? Dunno, probably 'do not know. And anyway, a criminal trial judge actions, not intentions.
After all, think of what becomes a kind of act di fede. Berlusconi docet: c’ha tanti processi perche’ ce l’hanno tutti con lui, o c’ha tanti processi perche’ ha fatto tante porcate?
Chi vota per lui sceglie la prima, chi non lo vota sceglie la seconda.
Io alla fine - sara’ perche’ ho studiato legge - se devo scegliere tra quello che mi dice un imputato e quello che mi dice un giudice, ho sempre la tendenza a fidarmi di piu’ del giudice.
Copiato e incollato da www.samopravo.net/2008/04/09/ajajajajaja/
0 comments:
Post a Comment